Hoffman Cup Champions!
November 19, 2015
HOFFMAN CUP CHAMPIONS!
The Daniel S. Hoffman Memorial Trial Advocacy Tournament is the “crown jewel” advocacy tournament for upperclassmen at our law school. The tournament is named after our beloved alumnus, former Dean of DU Law, and nationally-renowned attorney. The Champions endured six very competitive rounds of advocacy, and were ultimately crowned by our panel of esteemed alumni and area members of the bar (pictured above).
This fall we crowned the following:
Champions: Luke Corliss, Sarah Colburn, and Robert Zahradnik-Mitchell.
Best Advocate: Grant Grosgebauer (not pictured)
Pictured above (left to right): Denver Attorney and DU Alumnus, Cole Wist; Seattle-area and DU Law Alumnus, Barbara Frost; DU Law Alumnus and 2014 Hoffman Cup Best Advocate Winner, Jonathan Coppom; 2015 Champions, Luke Corliss, Robert Zahradnik-Mitchell, Sarah Colburn; Denver District Court Judge, John Madden IV; DU Law Professor C.J. Larkin; Aurora Municipal Judge, Dan Kopper.
National Trial Team Places in Top 5 at DC Tourney
November 19, 2015
NATIONAL TRIAL TEAM PLACES IN TOP 5 AT D.C. TOURNEY
Our National Trial Team finished in 5th Place (technically tied for 4th place) in a field of 22 teams at Georgetown Law School’s National White Collar Crime Trial Advocacy Tournament. Under the coaching and instruction of Attorney-Coach Sean Olson the All-2L squad of Josh Abromovitz, Alex Duncan, Kelly Frickleton, and Justin Friedberg, competed on behalf of our school, and Josh Abromovitz won the prestigious Best Advocate Award for the tournament.
National Trial Team Member Wins Best Advocate Award
November 16, 2015
NATIONAL TRIAL TEAM MEMBER WINS BEST ADVOCATE AWARD
Our National Trial Team recently competed at the fall Buffalo-Niagara Trial Advocacy Tournament, under the coaching and instruction of Attorney-Coach Kevin Keyes, and Assistant Coach Kyle McFarlane. The squad of Christopher Brummitt, Allison Derschang, Casey Fleming and Steven Visioli advanced past the “breakout” and Christopher Brummit won the prestigious Best Advocate Award.
Audio and Visual from the 2015 Leonard v.B. Sutton Colloquium
November 09, 2015
Nokero Lights Up Zimbabwe
October 28, 2015
IN THE NEWS — Steve Katsaros, Founder of Nokero, was a panelist at our recent Sutton Colloquium on Sustainable Development and Sustainable Energy.
“Solar Lights: Nokero Introduces New Solar Light Bulb In Zimbabwe”, an article in Green Building Elements, greenbuildingelements.com , features Steve’s dedication and commitment to creating and providing accessible, renewable, and affordable lighting to the world.
Nokero is a Denver-based company providing alternative renewable energy resources to the world. http://nokero.com .
Sutton Colloquium Presentations and Supporting Materials Available Now
October 23, 2015
Dr. John Dovidio speaks at DU about diversity in academia
October 21, 2015
Dr. John Dovidio, Dean of Academic Affairs of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences at Yale University, spoke to DU audiences at three events held October 21, 2015. Dr. Dovidio is a professor in Yale’s psychology department. His research centers around issues of social power and social relations, with an emphasis on conscious (explicit) and unconscious (implicit) bias in group dynamics. At DU, Dr. Dovidio addressed issues of diversity in academic settings, particularly in the hiring process.
Insights he offered at his first talk, held in Ruffato Hall, and which featured more q-and-a than lecture, are paraphrased below:
There are three common and strong foundations of implicit bias: the prevalent use of race, sex and age when we evaluate others; our tendency to view people either as members of our own group or as members of other, completing groups; and the lessons in race and sex taught us by our history and culture. While overt racism has decreased greatly in the past 50-60 years (Dr. Dovidio used the example of whites’ stated and demonstrated willingness to vote for a black presidential candidate), implicit or subtle bias remains strong. “Over-learned associations drive our behavior,” he said at one point.
Job searches in academia that do not produce diversity among faculty, administration and staff, he said, can result when the job is defined in ways that narrow the search, thus limiting inclusivity among candidates. He gave the example of an academic department that will only hire from the top twenty programs in its field.
He counseled that, in hiring, “Diversity must be the default,” and added that this is true throughout the institution. “Color-blindness,” when used to justify hiring that does not advance diversity is a rationalization and even more, this stance inevitably perpetuates the status quo and supports the majority. Among benefits of diverse hiring decisions, he cited examples where hiring women and people of color as faculty members in a particular department increased the number of students pursuing that field of study, thus advancing another institutional goal.
Asked how to gauge whether efforts to increase diversity in an academic setting are working or not, Dr. Dovidio stressed that they not be judged by intentions. “Monitor results,” he said. Told that DU’s first-year undergrad class numbers 22% students of color, he counseled our university to make that figure the floor going forward.
Near the end, the discussion turned toward questions of campus climate. Dr. Dovidio praised an undergraduate program at the University of Michigan where students in their first year are assigned to diverse groups in which facilitated conversations about race and gender are held. The first year of college is an especially effective time to have these discussions, he said, because students new to higher education are eager to experience their new world and surroundings. He then noted that friction inevitably arises when these conversations are held. “All friction is not positive,” he said, “but managed friction can by constructive.” – Randy Wagner (email me here)
Poverty & Race Research Action Council seeks Law and Policy Associate
October 14, 2015
Law & Policy Associate
The Poverty & Race Research Action Council is seeking a recent law school graduate who is committed to civil rights and who is interested in engaging in federal and state policy advocacy, detailed regulatory analysis, social science research, and public education and field outreach. This new position will primarily involve fair housing and federal and state low income housing programs, but may also include intersectional work in PRRAC’s other issue areas.
The Poverty & Race Research Action Council (PRRAC) is a non-profit civil rights law and policy organization based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1989 by major national civil rights and poverty law organizations, PRRAC’s primary mission is to help connect advocates with social scientists working on race and poverty issues, and to develop innovative approaches to structural inequality issues.
The ideal candidate for the Law & Policy Associate position would have excellent research and writing skills, a strong interest in federal policy work, and a demonstrated commitment to civil rights and poverty alleviation. Prior work with low income communities of color, and some background in housing law and policy, poverty law, or education law is preferred.
See the full job posting here.
Katie Steefel, Denver Law 2L, reports from the Lat Crit Conference
October 04, 2015
Katie Steefel is co-founder and co-chair of the Education Policy & Outreach Group (EPOG), a student group at Denver Law whose mission is to “foster law students’ and stakeholders’ capacities to understand, discuss, address, and impact what is an increasingly nuanced field of law and public policy increasing educational access.” Follow EPOG here. She attended and spoke on a panel at the 2015 Lat Crit Conference, held October 1 through 3 in Southern California. From her experience there, Ms. Steefel filed the following account:
Inclusiveness: the word continually came to mind throughout the 2015 Latina & Latino Critical Legal Theory Conference. Both the scholarly work and the atmosphere of the conference were infused with values of inclusiveness, diversity, and challenging the status quo. As a one of the few students attending the conference of faculty members, I was slightly apprehensive before the weekend. However, I had no reason for such apprehension. The anti-hierarchical and non-presumptuous vibe of the conference made a student like myself feel comfortable sitting next to anyone at any event during the three days. At almost every meal–all with ample vegetarian and vegan options–I sat next to someone new and had an engaging conversation. At every panel, comments and feedback from all members of the audience were encouraged and the children of those parent faculty member were welcomed. Each conversation left me thinking about a new way to pursue social justice.
It was invigorating to see the work of so many faculty members dedicated to disrupting subordination in its numerous forms and to advancing racial, gender, sexual orientation, and socio-economic justice. One of my favorite panels was called, “Prison Reform: Theory and Practice.” The three person panel examined prisons from various aspects such as: prisoners’ rights in jail, the manifestation of protests of prisons in the form of hip hop music, and a discussion of prison common spaces. The three completely distinct scholarly works all attacked the same problem of the treatment of prison, yet from very different perspectives. The three approaches side-by-side demonstrated the wide-range of issues facing the living standards of prisons.
One slight negative from the weekend is that I am even less sure of how I want to fight for social justice because my eyes were opened to so many new ways to do so. The three days exposed me to many different avenues to chip away at subordination. The huge presence of DU faculty at the conference was immensely encouraging for me as a student, illuminating the many rich resources available at Denver Law to help me find my path after law school.
Denver Law’s RPL Group is a presence at the 2015 Lat Crit Conference
October 03, 2015