2015 Leonard v.B.Sutton Colloquium
September 29, 2015
The 48th Annual Sutton Colloquium takes on the serious issues challenging the international community in their efforts to achieve Sustainable Development and Sustainable Energy goals. These goals aim to end poverty, protect the planet, enable access to sustainable energy for the common good. Leading academics and experts will engage in discussion around these challenges to global governance and the opportunities available to move ahead.
The Myles S. McDougal Lecture will be presented by Dr. Lakshman D. Guruswamy, Nicholas Doman Professor of Law at the University of Colorado Boulder. His topic, Global Energy Justice: The Jurisprudential Lineage, will look at existing principles of justice over the ages and argue that they should be applied in the solution of providing sustainable, renewable energy to the poor of the world.
Mark your calendars for Saturday, October 10th, 2015, from 8:30am – 5:30pm at the Sturm College of Law. CLE credits are available.
Be Part of the Pipeline Project at Denver Law
September 22, 2015
To learn more about the Denver Law’s Pipeline Project, and to volunteer for any of the opportunities below, please contact Randy Wagner
Chancellor Chopp and others on the need for increasing access to higher education
September 18, 2015
The September 18 inauguration ceremonies to install Rebecca Chopp as DU’s 18th chancellor included a breakfast panel which gave Chopp, Denver Mayor Michael Hancock and other state education leaders a platform to explore and examine “the importance to Colorado of increasing access to higher education.”
Chancellor Chopp praised higher education as a public, and not just a private, good crucial to the nation. “Democracy and education have gone hand in hand throughout our country’s history,” she stated. Mayor Hancock emphasized the role colleges play in preparing their students to operate well in an increasingly diverse and globalized world.
Other panelists were Metro State University President Stephen Jordan, Colorado Community College System President Nancy McCallin, and Tim Foster, President of Colorado Mesa University. They spoke about the value of and need for access institutions within higher education. “The faces of our students,” said Jordan, “should reflect the faces of our community, and the faces of our faculty should reflect the faces of our students.”
See video-recorded highlights of the breakfast panel on access to higher education here.
Purvi Shah: Movement lawyering to support social justice
September 11, 2015
Purvi Shah, from the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) in New York City, spoke with Denver Law students on September 11, 2015, about social movement lawyering. Drawing from her work and experiences in Ferguson, Missouri, and other locations, Ms. Shah began by emphasizing strategy rather than tactics: “I want us to take…a step back and talk about strategy,” she said. “Not what are we going to do, but two other questions that are more important. Why do we do it? And how?”
A series of “Rules of Movement Lawyering” followed, beginning with this one: “If you want to be a movement lawyer, the first thing to do is train yourself to run to the fire. When everybody else is running in the opposite direction, that is actually a significant data point for you. That means it is time to run in the direction where everything is going on.”
The second rule she offered is, “Go without an agenda”—on arrival, withstand the urge to jump in and immediately start doing and, instead, take time to listen. Lawyers have a set of skills valuable to social change but not sufficient to make it happen. It is vital to build coalitions with all participants. That begins by understanding the perspectives of others involved.
“Decide what side you are on,” is Ms. Shah’s third rule of movement lawyering. The fourth is, “You have do decide what you are going to do….Figure out what is needed in that moment.” Make signs, prepare food, pitch in. Lawyering is not the only work a movement lawyer does, and legal advocacy is not the only thing that drives a movement for social change. “High impact, low ego is a really beautiful, fitting anthem for …movement lawyers,” she said. “[I]t’s really trying to move yourself to the place where you will do what needs to be done.” Doing what is needed, she counseled, can be less than glamorous, and all roles have value. Next, she emphasized that this work is traumatizing and painful. It is important, throughout the process, to be self-aware “of your emotional capacities to do this work.” Those building and sustaining effective movements must stay emotionally well and whole.
Lastly, she counseled, it is the nature of social movements that, “No one knows what they are doing,” no one has all the answers, the perfect strategy. What does this mean? A movement lawyer must be open, reflective, self-aware, adaptive and collaborative. “Justice is a team sport,” she said. Prepare yourself for opportunities. The question to ask yourself, she said, is, “Can you do your part to move us to the next place?”
Ms. Shah directs the Bertha Justice Institute at the CCR. The institute is designed “to build a new generation of lawyers and legal workers that have the vision, expertise and determination to create social change.” Her talk at Denver Law kicked off a two-day meeting, “Lawyering for the Public Good: A Gathering of Denver Law Students Committed to Social Justice.” See and hear her discussion with Denver Law students on September 11, 2015 here.
Crimmigration Law by Professor César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández
September 10, 2015
In his newly-published book, Crimmigration Law, César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández, visiting assistant professor at Denver Law, maps the evolving convergence of criminal law and immigration law. “For most of the nation’s history,” he writes, “these operated almost entirely free of the other.” Now, however, “[t]hat division has undeniably become a historical relic. The world of criminal courthouses has collided with the world of immigration courthouses.”
The book is written, Professor García Hernández said, “for practitioners expanding their practice from criminal law to immigration law or vice versa, and also for the new crop of lawyers who understand these once separate areas of doctrine are melding in a unique way.”
Asked whether Crimmigration Law has particular relevance in the current political climate, Professor García Hernández replied, “Sadly, it does. Many policy prescriptions advocated and adopted by the Obama Administration ratchet up treatment of migrants with the clear implication they are inherently dangerous. And we’ve seen Republican presidential candidates state the same in the most explicit terms.”
At Denver Law, Professor García Hernández teaches Criminal Procedure, Torts and Immigration Law, as well as a seminar on Crimmigration Law. In 2014, he was presented the Derrick A. Bell, Jr. Award by the Association of American Law Schools Section on Minority Groups, honoring him as a “junior faculty member who, through activism, mentoring, colleagueship, teaching and scholarship, has made an extraordinary contribution to legal education, the legal system or social justice.”
Obergefell is a “building block” toward expanding legal protections for children
August 04, 2015
In her August 4th post on PrawfsBlawg, Denver Law Associate Dean and Professor Catherine Smith argues that Obergefell—the landmark same sex marriage rights decision—opens a path that can lead to stronger protection of equal rights for children of unmarried parents. “The United States,” she notes, “has a long history of discrimination against children of unmarried parents” and denying them “many legal and social benefits as a way to show moral disapproval of their parents’ decision to have them outside the bonds of marriage.” Though the Obergefell Court recognized the harms of marriage bans on children of same-sex parents, it did not cite or reference non-marital status cases extending equal protection status to non-marital children. “Nevertheless,” writes Professor Smith, “this rich equal protection law precedent offers great promise post-Obergefell for children’s rights advocates” and “could serve as a potential building block in expanding the legal and economic protections for children in many types of family configurations and for developing a more robust meaning of ‘family.’”
See Professor Smith’s PrawfsBlawg post for the argument in detail.
HNBA President (and Denver Law grad) Cynthia Mares on the lack of diversity in the legal profession
July 13, 2015
“As the current president of the Hispanic National Bar Association (HNBA), I spend a lot of my time talking with students, lawyers, and judges about the frustrating disconnect between the frequently expressed commitment to diversity in the legal profession and the absence of real progress in achieving that diversity.”
So writes Cynthia Mares. A Denver Law grad, Ms. Mares began her second term as Arapahoe County Public Trustee in early 2015. She was first appointed to the position in 2012 by Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper.
Her recent article in The Federal Lawyer documents and then examines why “this commitment to diversity and inclusiveness just doesn’t seem to be translating into the kind of measurable progress you might expect.” And she talks about paving a better path going forward.
Implicit bias plays a role in decisions that bar or hold back diverse attorneys, she notes. “There is evidence, though, that we can work around our implicit biases.” And she points out that, “Corporate culture that encourages diversity and inclusion can have real benefits for other reasons as well.” Her article highlights efforts to diversify the legal profession undertaken by corporations, law firms and the HNBA.
When changing social norms lead to changes in the law
July 02, 2015
Visiting Denver Law in August, 2012, as the Workplace Law Program’s Keynote Speaker, EEOC Commissioner Chai Feldblum spoke on the topic, The Creation of Social Change: Disability and LGBT Rights. She explained that advances in rights result from synergy that develops among three sources—the law, policy in practice and social norms. Here’s how she defined the three: the law is the text adopted by legislators, administrators and the judiciary; whether and how the text of that law is absorbed into the daily practices of an organization accounts for policy in practice; and social norms are understandings that engage the hearts and minds of people.
Now think about how these three sources interact, and which of the three leads the change. In the case of LGBT rights, Commissioner Feldblum stated that changes in the law are the product of changing social norms. Those norms encourage development of policy in practice. An example is protections for employees of differing sexual orientations adopted voluntarily by many prominent companies. At some point, according to the scheme developed in Commissioner Feldblum’s Keynote Address, the law will catch up.
While Chai Feldblum was discussing LGBT rights in the workplace, her proposition, that changes in social norms and policy in practice can precede and push forward changes in the law, applies as well to evolution in the law of marriage relating to same-sex couples. And, again, business entities are key catalysts in this process.
Consider the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Obergefell vs. Hodges. Among the many amicus briefs submitted in favor of Obergefell and other petitioners was the Brief of 379 Employers and Organizations Representing Employers . The authors argue that the dual regime (prior to the Court’s decision in Obergefell), wherein some states permit marriage for “all of our employees and colleagues; others prohibit marriages between couples of the same sex and refuse to recognize existing same-sex marriages,” burdens employers. “It creates legal uncertainty and imposes unnecessary costs and administrative complexities on employers, and requires differential employer treatment of employees who are similarly situated save for the state where they reside.” The result is that “[s]tate laws that prohibit or decline to recognize marriages between same-sex couples hamper employer efforts to recruit and retain the most talented workforce in those states.” (Statements above are found on pages 1-2 of the brief. The 379 employers and organizations composing the amici curiae submitting this brief fill pages 2 through 13).
It’s been said more than once that “What’s good for business is good for America.” You can argue whether that view holds or not in all domains of public policy. In the opinion of the 379 employers signing onto this brief, however, the Court’s historic decision in Obergefell—holding that same-sex couples have a fundamental right to marry—will help them prosper.
To close the circle on this discussion, let’s think about protections against discrimination in the workplace. That was Commissioner Feldblum’s focus during her talk at Denver Law. (See what else she did and said at Denver Law that day.) The fight for LGBT rights is likely to head this direction next. See for example this early word on that view, offered by Erik Eckholm in the New York Times two days after the Supreme Court announced the Obergefell decision.
- Randy Wagner (email me here)
Q-and-A: Catherine Smith takes a close look at the ruling in the same-sex marriage case
July 01, 2015
Interviewed for the University of Denver Magazine, Catherine Smith, professor of law and Associate Dean for Institutional Diversity and Inclusiveness at Denver Law, offers her analysis of the Supreme Court’s decision in the landmark same-sex marriage case, Obergefell v. Hodges. Click here for the Q-and-A session.
Historic SCOTUS decision establishing right to same-sex marriage cites brief by Catherine Smith
June 26, 2015
The historic decision establishing that the Constitution guarantees a right to same-sex marriage, announced by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 26, 2015, cites an amicus brief submitted by Denver Law professor Catherine Smith to support the proposition that “[m]arriage also affords the permanency and stability important to children’s best interests.” (Obergefell v Hodges, 2015, at page 15). Professor Smith, who also serves DU’s Sturm College of Law as Associate Dean for Institutional Diversity and Inclusiveness, co-authored the brief with legal scholars Lauren Fontana, Susannah Pollvogt and Tanya Washington. Their brief states that Supreme Court precedent “unequivocally establish[es] that states may not punish children based on matters beyond their control.” And “state marriage bans inevitably and necessarily perform exactly this impermissible function because they deprive children of same-sex couples legal, economic and social benefits associated with the institution of marriage.”