• News
  • Events
  • Directory
  • A-Z

University of Denver

  • Prospective Students
  • Current Students
  • Faculty & Staff
  • Alumni

Sturm College of LawSturm College of Law

  • Home
  • About DU Law
  • Admissions
  • Academics
  • Registrar
  • Faculty
  • Library
  • Careers
  • Donate
  •  
Print This PageEmail This Page
Home » Corporate Governance » Corporate Governance and Disclosure

Corporate Governance

In This Section

  • Corporate Governance
  • Cases
  • Corporate Governance and Bankruptcy
  • Corporate Governance and Disclosure
    • Arfa v. Mecox Lane Ltd.
    • Bader v. Blankfein
    • Bear Stearns
    • Centerline, In re
    • Ceridian Corp., In re
    • Checkfree Corp., In re
    • Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
    • Computer Associates
    • Comverse Tech, In re
    • Crocs, In re
    • CSX v. The Children's Investment Fund
    • Desimone v. Barrows
    • DiLorenzo v. Norton et al
    • Dixon v. ATI Ladish LLC
    • Dreiling v. America Online Inc.
    • Espinoza v Hewlett-Packard
    • Gantler v Stephens
    • GyneConcepts, Inc. v. Kim
    • In Re JQH
    • In re National City Corp
    • In Re Novastar
    • LA Municiple Police v. Countrywide Finanacial Corp.
    • Le v. Pham
    • Lefkoe
    • Liberty Property Trust v. Republic Properties Corporation
    • McPadden v. Sidhu
    • Miller v. Thane International, Inc.
    • Pfeffer v. Redstone
    • Pfeffer v. Redstone II
    • Refco, In re
    • Robotti & Co. LLC
    • SEC v. McKelvey
    • SEC v. Tambone
    • Stockman v. Heartland Industrial Partners
    • Tyco International v. Kozkowski
    • United States v. Saltsman
    • Wal-Mart
    • Worldcom
  • Criminal Cases
  • Empirical Studies
  • Follow Us Online
  • Governance Cases
  • Independent Director
  • International Corporate Governance
  • Legislation
  • Miscellaneous
  • NYSE, Nasdaq and FINRA
  • Sarbanes-Oxley
  • Say on Pay Cases
  • SEC and Governance
  • Securities Matters
  • Takeovers and Proxy Fights

Desimone v. Barrows, 2007 WL 1670266 (Del. Ch. 2007)

Unless noted, all documents are in PDF format.

Individual Defendants’ Opening Brief in Support of their Motion to Dismiss or Stay, Aug. 2, 2006 »

Amended Derivative Action Complaint, August 16, 2006 »

Exhibits A & B, Amended Derivative Action Complaint, August 16, 2006 »

Defendants’ Memorandum of Law in Support of their Motion to Dismiss, Dec. 4, 2006 »

Defendant Jewel’s Opening Brief in Support of Her Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, Dec. 4, 2006 »

Plaintiff’s Answering Brief in Opposition to All Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, Jan. 16, 2007 »

Defendants Francis Jewels’ Reply Brief in Further Support of Her Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, Feb. 6, 2007 »

Defendants’ Reply Brief in Support of their Motion to Dismiss, Feb. 6, 2007 »

Desimone v. Barrows, No. 2210-VCS, 2007 WL 1670255 (Del. Ch. June 7, 2007) »

  • Contact Us•
  • Directions & Parking
  • Apply Now•
  • Calendars•
  • Directory•
  • News•
  • A-Z Index

DU.edu | Contacts & Directions | Undergraduate Admission | Graduate Admission | Giving to DU | Jobs @ DU | News | Events | Directory | A-Z | Search

©2012 Sturm College of Law, University of Denver. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy.
The University of Denver is an equal opportunity/affirmative action institution

2255 E. Evans Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80208United States
•
Work(303) 871-6000