Home » Corporate Governance » Corporate Governance and Disclosure

In This Section

• Corporate Governance
• Academic Materials
• Articles and Papers
• Churchill v. U of CO
• Corporate Governance and Bankruptcy
• Corporate Governance and Disclosure
  • Bear Stearns
  • Centerline, In re
  • Ceridian Corp., In re
  • Checkfree Corp., In re
  • Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
  • Computer Associates
  • Comverse Tech, In re
  • Crocs, In re
  • CSX v. The Children's Investment Fund
  • Desimone v. Barrows
  • DiLorenzo v. Norton et al
  • Dreiling v. America Online Inc.
  • Gantler v Stephens
  • In re National City Corp
  • In Re Novastar
  • LA Municiple Police v. Countrywide Finanacial Corp.
  • Lefkoe
  • Liberty Property Trust v. Republic Properties Corporation
  • McPadden v. Sidhu
  • Pfeffer v. Redstone
  • Pfeffer v. Redstone II
  • Refco, In re
  • SEC v. McKelvey
  • SEC v. Tambone
  • Stockman v. Heartland Industrial Partners
  • United States v. Saltsman
  • Wal-Mart
  • Worldcom
• Criminal Cases
• Empirical Studies
• FEF v. PCAOB
• Governance Cases
• Independent Director
• International Corporate Governance
• Legislation
• NYSE, Nasdaq and FINRA
• Qwest and Nacchio Documents
• Sarbanes-Oxley
• SEC and Governance
• Securities Matters
• Takeovers and Proxy Fights

Centerline, In re

In re Centerline Holdings Company Securities Litigation, No. 08 Civ. 505 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2009)

Consolidated Class Action Complation Violation of Federal Securities Laws, In re Centerline Holdings Company Securities Litigation, No. 08 Civ. 505 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2009)

Defendants’ Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint, In re Centerline Holdings Company Securities Litigation, No. 08 Civ. 505 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2009)

Defendants’ Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of Their Motion to Dismiss the Consol. Class Action Complaint, In re Centerline Holdings Company Securities Litigation, No. 08 Civ. 505 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2009)

Lead Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint, In re Centerline Holdings Company Securities Litigation, No. 08 Civ. 505 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2009)