• News
  • Events
  • Directory
  • A-Z

University of Denver

  • Prospective Students
  • Current Students
  • Faculty & Staff
  • Alumni

Sturm College of LawSturm College of Law

  • Home
  • About Denver Law
  • Admissions
  • Academics
  • Registrar
  • Faculty
  • Library
  • Careers
  • Donate
  •  
Print This PageEmail This Page
Home » Corporate Governance » Corporate Governance and Disclosure

Corporate Governance

In This Section

  • Corporate Governance
  • Cases
  • Corporate Governance and Bankruptcy
  • Corporate Governance and Disclosure
    • Americas Mining Corp. v. Theriault
    • Arfa v. Mecox Lane Ltd.
    • Bader v. Blankfein
    • Bear Stearns
    • Centerline, In re
    • Ceridian Corp., In re
    • Checkfree Corp., In re
    • Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
    • Computer Associates
    • Comverse Tech, In re
    • Crocs, In re
    • CSX v. The Children's Investment Fund
    • Desimone v. Barrows
    • DiLorenzo v. Norton et al
    • Dixon v. ATI Ladish LLC
    • Dreiling v. America Online Inc.
    • Espinoza v Hewlett-Packard
    • Gantler v Stephens
    • GyneConcepts, Inc. v. Kim
    • In Re JQH
    • In re National City Corp
    • In Re Novastar
    • LA Municiple Police v. Countrywide Finanacial Corp.
    • Le v. Pham
    • Lefkoe
    • Liberty Property Trust v. Republic Properties Corporation
    • McPadden v. Sidhu
    • Miller v. Thane International, Inc.
    • Pfeffer v. Redstone
    • Pfeffer v. Redstone II
    • Refco, In re
    • Robotti & Co. LLC
    • SEC v. McKelvey
    • SEC v. Tambone
    • Stockman v. Heartland Industrial Partners
    • Tyco International v. Kozkowski
    • United States v. Saltsman
    • Wal-Mart
    • Worldcom
  • Criminal Cases
  • Empirical Studies
  • Follow Us Online
  • Governance Cases
  • Independent Director
  • International Corporate Governance
  • Legislation
  • Miscellaneous
  • NYSE, Nasdaq and FINRA
  • Sarbanes-Oxley
  • Say on Pay Cases
  • SEC and Governance
  • Securities Matters
  • Takeovers and Proxy Fights

Americas Mining Corp. v. Theriault

Complaint, Sousa v. Southern Peru Copper, No. 4908375, Del. Ch., Jan. 7, 2005

Defendants’ Motion for a Determination of Burden of Proof, In re Peru Deriv. Litig., CNo. 961, Del. Ch., Aug. 10, 2010

Defendants’ Reply Brief in Support of their Cross Motion for Summary Judgment, In re Peru Deriv. Litig., CNo. 961, Del. Ch., Oct. 27, 2010

Defendants’ Post-Trial Opening Brief, In re Peru Deriv. Litig., CNo. 961, Del. Ch.,July 1, 2011

Plaintiff’s Post-Trial Opening Brief, In re Peru Deriv. Litig., CNo. 961, Del. Ch.,July 1, 2011

Plaintiff’s Post-Trial Answering Brief, In re Peru Deriv. Litig., CNo. 961, Del. Ch.,July 8, 2011

Defendants’ Post-Trial Answering Brief, In re Peru Deriv. Litig., CNo. 961, Del. Ch.,July 8, 2011

Defendants’ Answering Brief in Opposition to Petition for Fees, In re Peru Deriv. Litig., CNo. 961, Del. Ch.,July 11, 2011

Plaintiff’s Petition for Fees, In re Peru Deriv. Litig., CNo. 961, Del. Ch., Oct. 28, 2011

Plaintiff’s Corrected Reply to Defendants’ Opposition to Fees, In re Peru Deriv. Litig., CNo. 961, Del. Ch., Nov. 18, 2011

Opinion, Americas Mining Corp. v. Theriault, Nos. 29, 2012, 30, 3012, 2012 LEXIS 459 (Del. Aug. 27, 2012)

  • Contact Us•
  • Directions & Parking
  • Apply Now•
  • Calendars•
  • Directory•
  • News•
  • A-Z Index

DU.edu | Contacts & Directions | Undergraduate Admission | Graduate Admission | Giving to DU | Jobs @ DU | News | Events | Directory | A-Z | Search

©2013 Sturm College of Law, University of Denver. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy.
The University of Denver is an equal opportunity/affirmative action institution

2255 E. Evans Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80208United States
•
Work(303) 871-6000